First page of the unique archive.

Guitar build – What color to choose???

Posted by is9582 on March 30, 2013 with No Commentsas , , , , , , , , ,

Well, I’ve done most of the sanding for the Les Paul build which I’ve been building. I’m having the hardest time deciding what color scheme I’d like to have for the foreseeable future. I’ve always been fond of the old ’59 Gibson Les Paul guitars (who isn’t, right?) and some of those guitars have transitioned from a vibrant sunburst to a much more muted version. Some have even lost the majority of the cherry red coloration that originally adorned the outside edge of the guitar. Now those are almost a pure amber/honey color that has a great deal of appeal.

Yesterday I was trolling through some of the Los Angeles guitar seller’s websites, and saw some guitars that were much more bold, but still allowed the nice figuration of the top to show through. One specific maker was Tom Anderson, and one of his Bulldog guitars is listed on Mesa Boogie’s L.A. store’s website. What a great looking guitar.

Ok, since I’m having some trouble deciding on the color for my build, I was hoping I might get some input from those reading my article(s). Here are four photos, showing the body of my guitar as it sits presently, as well as a maple board with a couple of sections finished differently. The photos were taken on my iPhone, so please bear with me, but the most critical thing, on which I’d ask you to focus, is imagining the colors presented on my guitar. (Please notice the bright green arrows, as they will identify which of the colors is associated with the selection, in each photo.) Following the four photos, I’ve also included a picture showing a section of a guitar top, that is amber/honey in color.

Without further adiu:

Here is the 1st.
   
The 2nd
The 3rd.
And the 4th. You probably can’t see much difference, but this last has two  colors.
The arrow is actually pointing at the portion I would like you to consider. The other side
of the lower color block is a bit lighter, although the photo quality doesn’t show this well.

Below is picture that represents the earlier mentioned amber/honey coloration, which is very much like those old guitars where the cherry portion has faded:

Example of amber/honey coloration, and you can call it the 5th and last.
So now you have five colors from which to choose. Just let me know which you think is best, Ok?
I know I’ve been dragging my feet on the finishing, but I have one last thing I need to do, relating to the electronics. You very well may be able to guess what is missing, but I’m not going to talk about that right now, since I’m actually planning to handle it differently than any other guitar I’ve ever seen or played. I’m hoping I can find the components I need, to complete the guitar in the manner I’ve envisioned. Stay tuned and I’ll share this with you in an upcoming article. 
Thanks again for reading my blog and I look forward to your suggestion.
Lee

Let’s Skate towards Sharpness

Posted by is9582 on February 7, 2012 with No Commentsas , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I don’t know about everyone else, but even though I have a good sharpening routine, I’m always looking out on the horizon for something potentially better. I’ve either owned or used most of the current, and many of the older sharpening guides/tools, so I’m really looking forward to testing what ultimately is a new concept in sharpening.

One honing guide I’ve had on my radar for easily over a year, is the Sharp Skate. Actually, I recall seeing information on the Sharp Skate, before it had transitioned to v.2 and v.3, so it has been a fair amount of time. A friend of mine recently purchased v.3 and has been kind enough to let me test it out. With many tools/accessories, there can be a bit of a ramp up to get comfortable. This was exactly my experience with the Sharp Skate.

The Sharp Skate comes with a dock, which has grooves on both sides, that are each associated with a specific angle.

System components; dock front right.

I have to admit that when I saw this on the advertisements, I completely misunderstood how the dock worked. I initially thought the sharp edge of whatever tool you were sharpening, would fit into one of the grooves, registering the angle the same each and every time. Well, the last part was correct, but surprisingly, instead of the sharp edge, the bevel on the tool registers in the grooves. I was completely shocked. After trying the proscribed method and giving it the old college try, I’m not sure the dock is a fit for me. I’m sure many out there would disagree, and find the functionality of the dock wonderful, but I find it hard to tell in which groove I’ve landed.

Sharp Skate sitting in dock.

It turns out that my friend that loaned me the Sharp Skate, John Parkinson, had this same issue, especially when trying to work at a very high angle, like 45 degrees. This prompted him to make a projection angle guide, not too dissimilar to the one Deneb Puchalski at Lie-Nielsen Toolworks created. This guide makes setting the angles much easier than I experienced using the dock.

Projection angle guide for Sharp Skate (notice the shorter lengths for each angle).

I own a set of Shapton glass stones, which I keep stored away, that I reintroduced for the Sharp Skate test. I used the Shaptons, since they have a harder matrix, and will be less prone to grooving than my Norton waterstones. Sharpening a tool side to side, especially if working a micro bevel or small surface area, would seem to have a higher chance of creating grooves in a stone. Compare this action to a side clamping guide, where the bevel is 90 degrees to the direction of the sharpening, and it would seem all too obvious. Anyways, for this test, I thought I’d try the Sharp Skate on a chisel, an old block plane iron, and a skew block plane iron.

The chisel was fairly simple to set into the Sharp Skate’s alignment grooves, and using the projection guide, the proper angle was easily set. I did notice, while aligning the chisel, that a perceptible amount of side to side rotational movement existed until I completely tightened the main knob with my fingers. I checked the chisel, after a couple of strokes, and one corner was showing signs it was set heavier than the other. The slight bit of difference seems like it just might be from the “play” I described. As info, I verified the chisel was centered, both at the front and backside of the guide. Hmmm, interesting.  Ok, first attempt using this guide, so lets possibly chalk it up to user error. I went back at it, and using slightly different pressure, achieved a very sharp chisel with a more consistent bevel, in just a couple of minutes.

I refreshed the stones and jigged up the old block plane iron, again verifying it was centered, using the projection jig agin. This iron had an extremely small chip in the center portion of the iron, so I expected to spend some extra time on the 1000 stone. After a few strokes, I noticed heavier steel removal on one side of the iron again.  I again adjusted my hand pressure to change the results. On both original and modified techniques, I tried to use a non-arcing back and forth movement, so I was surprised how easily I could ultimately impart a small camber using only pressure. I like that flexibility, but also realize more focus is required, to make certain the iron’s shape is as desired. I sharpened all over the surface of the 1000 grit stone, which is actually one of the special things about this guide. The layout of the tool’s wheels allows it to sharpen tools up to the very edge/end of stones. Ultimately using the full surface, and if the user is paying attention, this can help prevent wearing a hollow in the stone. After finishing on the 1000 stone, I spent another minute on the finish stone, resulting in another very sharp edge.

Lastly, I wanted to jig up my iron from one of my 140 skew block planes. Since the iron is skewed by 18 degrees, and I didn’t see any reference to this angle on the Sharp Skate, I almost stopped (no pun intended) this part of the test. Luckily, I read the fine print in an included paper, that referenced one of the “hard” stops as 18 degrees.  (These “hard” stops are pre-drilled holes in the clamping plate, that line up with a hole just inside each end of the guide. There are hardened pins that fit down through both sets of holes, to hold alignment. When working with a square orientation tool, the pins are in similar holes, midway between the front and back edge of the plate.)

Hardened pins to the right, removed from the alignment holes in body and clamping plate.

 I breathed a slight sigh of relief and started to center up the iron. With the clamping plate set for a skew, one side sticks proud of the main Sharp Skate body. This somewhat gets in the way, when using the projection guide to set the angles, so I played around to find the correct angle, applying some Sharpie to the bevel, to provide feedback.

Bevel side of the blade showing the Sharpie applied.

  Initially, I had the iron set with a short projection, and it showed a potential problem that could occur.

The gold section in the upper right, with the three holes, is the thicker section that made contact with the stone.

Since the clamping plate (for lack of better terms) on the Sharp Skate, is thinner in the middle and gets thicker towards each edge, a short projection while skewed can bring a corner of the plate into play. Luckily, I was using light contact and paying close attention. As I set the wheels of the Sharp Skate onto the stone, and lightly engaged the bevel, I thought it looked like the plate might be touching on one side. I moved over to the edge of the stone, so I could slide onto the stone, from the side away from the projecting plate. As I moved slowly onto the stone, I saw the plate was acting as a stop, since it was out further than the iron, at the plate’s thickest point. As luck would have it, this setting was too steep of an angle. I adjusted the iron a couple of times, until I was satisfied with the angle, and this was out far enough that the plate no longer engaged the stone. I guess this is just something to keep in mind, if in fact you need a very steep bevel or micro bevel. With this final setting, I was able to rapidly, and accurately sharpen this somewhat difficult iron in just a matter of minutes. Very impressive.

Barely visible micro-bevel.

Overall I think the Sharp Skate version 3 is an awfully cool and functional honing guide. As I’d mentioned earlier, there is a small learning curve, and then it’s off to the races. I’ll probably continue to use some of my existing guides, but as this is so well made, there still may be a place in my sharpening stables for this tool.